Worst cities for dating cosmo
In partnership with AXE Deodorant Bodyspray Hooking that hottie is hard enough without the odds stacked against you, so the city researchers at Sperling’s Best Places have identified for you "America’s Best and Worst Cities for Dating." The study is based on criteria that includes percentage of singles ages 18-24, population density, and dating venues per capita such as concerts, coffee shops, bars, bowling alleys, etc., and includes 80 metro areas in America.
To learn more about AXE products, check out their website at
There’s a reason Los Angeles is so close to the happiest places on earth.
Known as “the city that works,” you’ll find this city works for you when you’re seeking a single woman.
Honolulu has the lowest number of lingerie shops per capita, probably because no one’s wearing much clothing to begin with. 77) are among cities with the lowest number of 18-24 year olds Percentage of Singles: Charlotte, NC, (overall No. 75) are among those cities that are home to the least number of coffee shops per capita, leaving few good places for young people to converge and trade stories after a fun night out Remove Earplugs: Louisville (overall No. 74) is among the cities with the least amount of hot new bars, leaving young singles looking for places to meet potential hook ups "We've received feedback from some of the lowest ranking cities, and it appears our findings are on-track," noted Sperling.
Ann Arbor, MI: Scores in the 98th percentile for percentage of singles and ranks high in the dining out category as well Springfield, MA: Springfield scores high in many categories, among them are percentage of singles, health clubs per capita and bars per capita in the area Honolulu, HI: Honolulu ranks first in the diversity index category, which rates the likelihood of randomly meeting someone of a different race or ethnicity, and scores the highest in the dining out category as well. 72) is among cities with the least amount of lingerie shops per capita Behind Bars: Atlanta (overall No.